Everyone who knows me, knows me as an impatient and stubborn person. I am also not the type to give people the benefit of the doubt. Once you piss me off, you've pissed me off, and it will take a while for me to get unpissed off. Sorry, that's just the way the story goes.
I'm also often told that I'm needlessly mean to retail associates and servers. I think that is true. And mind you, being "mean" is not the same as being "disrespectful". I do my best to respect people as people, regardless of whether they are working behind the counter or leading a department meeting. I try to be polite and gracious, as social norms generally require me to be.
When folks and I say that I'm mean to retail and food service workers, I think the more accurate way to describe it is that I have particular (and very selfish) expectations, which come from my own years of working in retail and food service.
A good ol' Weblog for musings about language, literature, music, art, food, etc.
Showing posts with label career. Show all posts
Showing posts with label career. Show all posts
2019-03-11
2017-06-10
A Long Road to Publishing a Peer-Reviewed Journal Article
On 5 June 2017, I delivered my first peer-reviewed journal article into this world. (I'm not counting my 2006 article about English acquisition, sorry.) Though much less painful than a childbirth, the process took a hell of a lot longer than bringing a human baby into this world.
If you're one of those people who can publish articles while in a Ph.D. program; can balance writing and teaching skillfully; mostly get "publish with minor revisions" as a submission response; or can publish more than one article a year, what I write below may come as a shock to you. Or appalling. I don't care. I'm extremely thankful for this publication, and I know I couldn't have done it without help from the people around me every step of the way.
This post is for anyone out there who has ever felt like it's damn near impossible to get a publication out. I am here to tell you: It can be done; it just might take a really, really long time.
If you're one of those people who can publish articles while in a Ph.D. program; can balance writing and teaching skillfully; mostly get "publish with minor revisions" as a submission response; or can publish more than one article a year, what I write below may come as a shock to you. Or appalling. I don't care. I'm extremely thankful for this publication, and I know I couldn't have done it without help from the people around me every step of the way.
This post is for anyone out there who has ever felt like it's damn near impossible to get a publication out. I am here to tell you: It can be done; it just might take a really, really long time.
2017-05-31
CV and Makeup
I submitted grades last Wednesday so for a couple of days after that I binge-watched makeup tutorials on YouTube. As per usual.
And then I also used my newfound freedom to give comments on a CV that's in development. Man, I love going through CVs.
Then as I was rolling around on the floor trying to finish reading two books before the library due date, I realize that the process of putting on makeup was very similar to the process of revising a CV.
Yeah, I know. The kinds of things I think of when summer vacation is knocking on my door.
And then I also used my newfound freedom to give comments on a CV that's in development. Man, I love going through CVs.
Then as I was rolling around on the floor trying to finish reading two books before the library due date, I realize that the process of putting on makeup was very similar to the process of revising a CV.
Yeah, I know. The kinds of things I think of when summer vacation is knocking on my door.
2017-03-11
OK, Look; or, My Ramblings on the BBC Interview Interruption
I'm writing this post on a Friday night because I have a deadline looming ahead this coming Tuesday, and I know that this weekend is going to be unpleasant. And because I only posted once in February and I'm thinking that it's going to be a similar situation in March, I'm just going to take this moment to bust out something for the month and also procrastinate at the same time. I never did dislike killing two birds with one stone.
So, this morning my alarm goes off at 6:50 AM, like it does every day (which, may I remind you, is still 10 minutes earlier than in the song "Skid Row"). I'm snoozing it and tossing and turning because my neck and shoulders have continued to hurt since the night before. Before the alarm goes off a second time, I receive a link to a BBC story about how a BBC interview with a Korea specialist was interrupted because the interviewee's kids walked into the interview room.
I've clearly got nothing better than do (except, perhaps, to actually get myself out of bed), so I click on the link and watch the video in bed. And, I don't know about you, but it horrified me in a very strange way.
Today I had meetings back-to-back and then was hounded by my impending doom/deadline, so I haven't had a chance to read/see what others have said about the video clip. But, to me there are just so many things wrong that happen in the clip.
So, you're an academic and have spent years writing and teaching about a certain topic. Then the country that happens to be your research site has a political scandal, and you're tapped by the BBC for an interview on the topic. (I'm not sure if this is the case for our BBC interviewee, but I speculate.) Hey, if that happened to me, I'd just figured I'd made it and drop the mike right then and there.
But gosh darn it, your kids have to walk into the room and screw it all up.
But, but. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't try to push the kid out of sight, skillfully looking only at my computer screen, which captures both my BBC interviewer's image and my own (and my room that also now includes my child/children). I'm also pretty sure I wouldn't be sitting in a room that had books laid out in strategic locations, because my books like to live very crampedly in my actual bookshelves, where I believe books belong.
I'm pretty sure that if my kid walked into the room, I would give myself an immediate face palm, laugh bitterly, apologize to the BBC interviewer, and, seething, ask my five-year-old to go back to the kitchen and continue to color her freakin' coloring book, as I had instructed her to do about seven times that morning at breakfast.
I'm pretty sure that if my partner frantically burst into the room, crawling on all fours to collect our little tykes, I'd at least thank her (albeit ironically) for handling the situation for me. As in, I would at least acknowledge her existence.
I think. I'm pretty sure.
And you know what? If I were being interviewed by the BBC and my kid walked into the room and I shoved the kid to get her out of my built-in FaceTime's sight, I would probably get called a bad mother. A horrible mother. An inhuman(e) mother. And I'd also probably get called a bad academic, because I'm not professional enough and I can't get my shit (i.e., my family/kids) together.
I wonder what others have said about the clip so far. I imagine there are others who feel similarly. I imagine I'm not the only one who doesn't find humor in that clip. It's just too bad I don't have time this weekend to be reading up on this here trending topic.
So, this morning my alarm goes off at 6:50 AM, like it does every day (which, may I remind you, is still 10 minutes earlier than in the song "Skid Row"). I'm snoozing it and tossing and turning because my neck and shoulders have continued to hurt since the night before. Before the alarm goes off a second time, I receive a link to a BBC story about how a BBC interview with a Korea specialist was interrupted because the interviewee's kids walked into the interview room.
I've clearly got nothing better than do (except, perhaps, to actually get myself out of bed), so I click on the link and watch the video in bed. And, I don't know about you, but it horrified me in a very strange way.
Today I had meetings back-to-back and then was hounded by my impending doom/deadline, so I haven't had a chance to read/see what others have said about the video clip. But, to me there are just so many things wrong that happen in the clip.
So, you're an academic and have spent years writing and teaching about a certain topic. Then the country that happens to be your research site has a political scandal, and you're tapped by the BBC for an interview on the topic. (I'm not sure if this is the case for our BBC interviewee, but I speculate.) Hey, if that happened to me, I'd just figured I'd made it and drop the mike right then and there.
But gosh darn it, your kids have to walk into the room and screw it all up.
But, but. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't try to push the kid out of sight, skillfully looking only at my computer screen, which captures both my BBC interviewer's image and my own (and my room that also now includes my child/children). I'm also pretty sure I wouldn't be sitting in a room that had books laid out in strategic locations, because my books like to live very crampedly in my actual bookshelves, where I believe books belong.
I'm pretty sure that if my kid walked into the room, I would give myself an immediate face palm, laugh bitterly, apologize to the BBC interviewer, and, seething, ask my five-year-old to go back to the kitchen and continue to color her freakin' coloring book, as I had instructed her to do about seven times that morning at breakfast.
I'm pretty sure that if my partner frantically burst into the room, crawling on all fours to collect our little tykes, I'd at least thank her (albeit ironically) for handling the situation for me. As in, I would at least acknowledge her existence.
I think. I'm pretty sure.
And you know what? If I were being interviewed by the BBC and my kid walked into the room and I shoved the kid to get her out of my built-in FaceTime's sight, I would probably get called a bad mother. A horrible mother. An inhuman(e) mother. And I'd also probably get called a bad academic, because I'm not professional enough and I can't get my shit (i.e., my family/kids) together.
I wonder what others have said about the clip so far. I imagine there are others who feel similarly. I imagine I'm not the only one who doesn't find humor in that clip. It's just too bad I don't have time this weekend to be reading up on this here trending topic.
2016-10-05
AAA #2: More Thoughts for the Application Stage of the Academic Job Search
It's...been over two months since I last wrote a post?! Well, I suppose I can pretend like I'd been actually "working" that whole time...
As we get closer to the early-ish deadlines for humanities jobs, I realized that I hadn't written about two specific documents that are (often) a part of the application packet submitted for job calls: the cover letter and the teaching statement.
These are, as always, my personal opinions—so do disregard what seems inappropriate for you or the jobs for which you are applying. I'll have more thoughts later about phone interviews and campus visits—which you will be offered if you do your due diligence, present yourself as fitting the position, and also have a heavy sprinkle of luck!
As we get closer to the early-ish deadlines for humanities jobs, I realized that I hadn't written about two specific documents that are (often) a part of the application packet submitted for job calls: the cover letter and the teaching statement.
These are, as always, my personal opinions—so do disregard what seems inappropriate for you or the jobs for which you are applying. I'll have more thoughts later about phone interviews and campus visits—which you will be offered if you do your due diligence, present yourself as fitting the position, and also have a heavy sprinkle of luck!
2016-07-21
AAA #1: 7 Considerations for the Application Stage of the Academic Job Search
This past year I had the chance to serve on a search committee for a tenure-track position in my department. I learned so much in the process, that I wanted to write a few posts about the experience before I forgot about it.
Thus the start of a new series, American Academia Awesomeness—because, you know, at some point I have to leave my Grad School stage behind.
Whatever I write, as always, is my personal opinion—from my perspective, my department, my college, my university. But if any of this is helpful for people, that would be great.
This post is about the application stage in the academic job search process. I'll write posts about other stages later.
Here are my personal thoughts about how people submit applications to academic job searches—as well as what might go in the content.
Thus the start of a new series, American Academia Awesomeness—because, you know, at some point I have to leave my Grad School stage behind.
Whatever I write, as always, is my personal opinion—from my perspective, my department, my college, my university. But if any of this is helpful for people, that would be great.
This post is about the application stage in the academic job search process. I'll write posts about other stages later.
Here are my personal thoughts about how people submit applications to academic job searches—as well as what might go in the content.
2015-12-26
みにくいアヒル『が教える お金持ちになるための知恵』
(「おねーしゃん、お腹すいたから、クラッカー下さい・・・」と私に迫る、某アヒル一羽。)
たとえアヒルでも、「お姉さん」と呼んでもらえるのが嬉しい・・・
以前私はモデルの仕事に応募した事がありました。書類審査は合格でしたが、カメラテストで落選。残念。
って、全然残念じゃなかったんだけどね。実際モデルになりたかったと言うより、う〜ん・・・説明し難い。
で、そのカメラテストの時にお話ししたカメラマンさんが教えてくれたのは、モデルになりたい人達は、ちゃんと自分をどう可愛く見せるかを研究していると言う事。だから、笑い方も、写真の撮られ方も、勿論自分に似合う洋服もヘアメイクも ちゃんと研究・練習している。
そうですよね。だって、お仕事だもん。私、本は読むけど、自撮りとか苦手だし。一人だとやっぱサムイし。
それでですね、モデルにはならないんですけど、私ができる「お仕事」って一体何か、と思いまして。今はれっきとしたお仕事があるんですけど、それをもっと「極める」にはどうしたらいいか。
考えなくてもやらなくてはならない事は山程あります。でもね、何でしょう、その・・・目的地はわかってるし、道順もわかってる。あとは、どの乗り物で行くか・・・
今、『イヌが教える お金持ちになるための知恵』と言う本を読んでいます。(まだ終わってないけど。)その本のなかに、お金儲けをするには、自分が知っている事、自分ができる事、そして自分が持っている物を明確にして、それを基に行動するべき、と書いてあります。う〜ん・・・自分ができる事・・・
何だろ、一体。本を読む事?食べる事?う〜ん・・・絶対違う・・・
と言う訳で皆さん、メリークリスマス!来年の抱負等も考えながら、今夜はもう一仕事させて頂きます。
たとえアヒルでも、「お姉さん」と呼んでもらえるのが嬉しい・・・
以前私はモデルの仕事に応募した事がありました。書類審査は合格でしたが、カメラテストで落選。残念。
って、全然残念じゃなかったんだけどね。実際モデルになりたかったと言うより、う〜ん・・・説明し難い。
で、そのカメラテストの時にお話ししたカメラマンさんが教えてくれたのは、モデルになりたい人達は、ちゃんと自分をどう可愛く見せるかを研究していると言う事。だから、笑い方も、写真の撮られ方も、勿論自分に似合う洋服もヘアメイクも ちゃんと研究・練習している。
そうですよね。だって、お仕事だもん。私、本は読むけど、自撮りとか苦手だし。一人だとやっぱサムイし。
それでですね、モデルにはならないんですけど、私ができる「お仕事」って一体何か、と思いまして。今はれっきとしたお仕事があるんですけど、それをもっと「極める」にはどうしたらいいか。
考えなくてもやらなくてはならない事は山程あります。でもね、何でしょう、その・・・目的地はわかってるし、道順もわかってる。あとは、どの乗り物で行くか・・・
今、『イヌが教える お金持ちになるための知恵』と言う本を読んでいます。(まだ終わってないけど。)その本のなかに、お金儲けをするには、自分が知っている事、自分ができる事、そして自分が持っている物を明確にして、それを基に行動するべき、と書いてあります。う〜ん・・・自分ができる事・・・
何だろ、一体。本を読む事?食べる事?う〜ん・・・絶対違う・・・
と言う訳で皆さん、メリークリスマス!来年の抱負等も考えながら、今夜はもう一仕事させて頂きます。
2015-12-09
Student Opinion Questionnaire
文学の授業の学生さんが、パンを焼いてくれました。「軽くトーストすると、美味しいですよ」と言われたので、家に帰って早速試したら、本当に美味しい。外側は硬くて、中はフワフワ。ほわ〜ん。
My first semester is coming to an end. I couldn't have asked for better teaching assignments or better students. Even the chatty ones...
今学期は色々ありました。何しろ一緒に仕事ができる先生方、スタッフの人々、学生さん達。カリフォルニアに戻って来れた事もひっくるめて——「ありがとう」。
My first semester is coming to an end. I couldn't have asked for better teaching assignments or better students. Even the chatty ones...
今学期は色々ありました。何しろ一緒に仕事ができる先生方、スタッフの人々、学生さん達。カリフォルニアに戻って来れた事もひっくるめて——「ありがとう」。
2015-08-26
Whoops, or, the Academic Mating Game
I just offended a good friend from college, which reminded me that I haven't posted in over three weeks.
Last week I had an orientation for my new job. It started with free food and ended with free food, so I have nothing bad to say about it.
The orientation did, however, make me consider that which I am calling "The Mating Game". It's a game in which players try to find a mate with whom to build a nest and procreate. It's going on at most times, in most places—but it heats up when players enter into new situations, like starting a new job.
What I was reminded of through the orientation last week was how academics complicate The Mating Game—like they complicate much of everything else.
If you are an academic that is starting a new job, it might be better for you not to be playing The Mating Game (e.g., already have found a mate so that you are no longer playing)—because participation in the game can cause you unnecessary stress.
If you are an academic playing The Mating Game at a new institution, you might find yourself thinking, "Oh my goodness, an entirely new pond...am I going to be able to catch any fish??" You might find yourself being more careful than you used to be about what to wear to campus—not only because you want to give your colleagues the impression that you are tenurable, but also because you never know who might be standing behind you in line at the library circulation desk. You might also notice just how much more intriguing people's left ring fingers are—like they're somehow going to provide you the missing link you needed to support the argument in your next manuscript.
You might also be an entirely rational academic, telling yourself that you have bigger things to worry about than TMG—namely RTP. You might also know from experience that A Mate is not something that you look for, it's just something you stumble upon, like a cute Made in Korea ballpoint pen that someone left behind in the lecture hall. Or you might have the good sense of looking outside of academia for your Mate, knowing full well that one academic in a couple already has too much self-absorption going on.
(Just kidding...it's not like non-academics don't have self-absorption going on...)
But if you are like most academics, you probably realize that, really, dating an academic is so much easier than dating a non-academic. They understand the pressure before a fellowship application deadline. They understand the inanity that is departmental politics. They understand that, yes, it looks like you get a looooong summer vacation, but that's really more time spent on your research and course development, in addition to the nights and weekends that have fallen to a similar fate.
And when you date an academic as an academic, you get an automatic reviewer of your work without having to submit it to a journal. You get someone who'll be straightforward with you about the quality of your teaching and research, because that person wants to see you improve—and thrive—at the thing you most love doing. And you'll have a travel buddy who is genuinely interested in attending that conference with you, if only because it's so much more fun just to go to a conference than to present at one.
But alas...The Mating Game is not so easy for an academic at a new institution, because it turns out most people are already spoken for by the time they start their tenure-track jobs. You realize that your awkward, introverted self is matched by the awkward, introverted others who also populate the various departments across your institution. And even if you swore that you were going to be social and attend various functions across campus, let's face it, once the academic term starts, you're lucky if you make it out to pick up your CSA box once a week. And the more you try to diffuse the stress of TMG, the more you realize that you are simply being washed up in the heteronormative, patriarchal institution that is MATING. ::sigh::
And then you end up being the academic who is no longer at a new institution, because you've been there for a number of years already...and you end up looking around at the annual New Faculty Orientation dinner for someone who seems friendly, attractive, and unmated. But then, in all the wisdom that you have accumulated in your career, you tell yourself: this is the name of the game. Teachers grow old, while the students remain the same age—just like the way you grow old, while the incoming new faculty remain the same age. And the good thing is, you'll never let the stress turn into desperation. After all, writing that journal article is often more rewarding than dealing with the results of The Mating Game.
Last week I had an orientation for my new job. It started with free food and ended with free food, so I have nothing bad to say about it.
The orientation did, however, make me consider that which I am calling "The Mating Game". It's a game in which players try to find a mate with whom to build a nest and procreate. It's going on at most times, in most places—but it heats up when players enter into new situations, like starting a new job.
What I was reminded of through the orientation last week was how academics complicate The Mating Game—like they complicate much of everything else.
If you are an academic that is starting a new job, it might be better for you not to be playing The Mating Game (e.g., already have found a mate so that you are no longer playing)—because participation in the game can cause you unnecessary stress.
If you are an academic playing The Mating Game at a new institution, you might find yourself thinking, "Oh my goodness, an entirely new pond...am I going to be able to catch any fish??" You might find yourself being more careful than you used to be about what to wear to campus—not only because you want to give your colleagues the impression that you are tenurable, but also because you never know who might be standing behind you in line at the library circulation desk. You might also notice just how much more intriguing people's left ring fingers are—like they're somehow going to provide you the missing link you needed to support the argument in your next manuscript.
You might also be an entirely rational academic, telling yourself that you have bigger things to worry about than TMG—namely RTP. You might also know from experience that A Mate is not something that you look for, it's just something you stumble upon, like a cute Made in Korea ballpoint pen that someone left behind in the lecture hall. Or you might have the good sense of looking outside of academia for your Mate, knowing full well that one academic in a couple already has too much self-absorption going on.
(Just kidding...it's not like non-academics don't have self-absorption going on...)
But if you are like most academics, you probably realize that, really, dating an academic is so much easier than dating a non-academic. They understand the pressure before a fellowship application deadline. They understand the inanity that is departmental politics. They understand that, yes, it looks like you get a looooong summer vacation, but that's really more time spent on your research and course development, in addition to the nights and weekends that have fallen to a similar fate.
And when you date an academic as an academic, you get an automatic reviewer of your work without having to submit it to a journal. You get someone who'll be straightforward with you about the quality of your teaching and research, because that person wants to see you improve—and thrive—at the thing you most love doing. And you'll have a travel buddy who is genuinely interested in attending that conference with you, if only because it's so much more fun just to go to a conference than to present at one.
But alas...The Mating Game is not so easy for an academic at a new institution, because it turns out most people are already spoken for by the time they start their tenure-track jobs. You realize that your awkward, introverted self is matched by the awkward, introverted others who also populate the various departments across your institution. And even if you swore that you were going to be social and attend various functions across campus, let's face it, once the academic term starts, you're lucky if you make it out to pick up your CSA box once a week. And the more you try to diffuse the stress of TMG, the more you realize that you are simply being washed up in the heteronormative, patriarchal institution that is MATING. ::sigh::
And then you end up being the academic who is no longer at a new institution, because you've been there for a number of years already...and you end up looking around at the annual New Faculty Orientation dinner for someone who seems friendly, attractive, and unmated. But then, in all the wisdom that you have accumulated in your career, you tell yourself: this is the name of the game. Teachers grow old, while the students remain the same age—just like the way you grow old, while the incoming new faculty remain the same age. And the good thing is, you'll never let the stress turn into desperation. After all, writing that journal article is often more rewarding than dealing with the results of The Mating Game.
2015-04-20
卒業
と、私日経ウーマンをネットで読むの辞めました。 以前は自分が読んでも使える情報が載ってんたんですが、最近自分が求めてるモノが変わってきたと言うか•••
で、日経ウーマンに関するポストはこれで最後?と思います。「転機」を呼ぶ方法!どうやら私は「直感力」が鈍いそうです。確かに毎日、毎週同じ事をしてるので、直感的に行動する時間はありませんが。
今までは、土曜日だったら瑞穂区の図書館に行って本読んでましたけど、最近忙しくて全然行ってません。でも、これを機会に、「毎月」読んでた「同じ雑誌」に「さよなら」を言う事に。
さよなら、日経ウーマン。私、貴方から卒業します。長い間、お世話になりました。
2015-03-06
GSA #13: On (Skype) Interviews
One, many of our applicants have accomplished incredible things, even before they get to college. They think deep thoughts, do exciting things, and overcome considerable obstacles. I am impressed. (Of course, the students whose applications I read are a particular subset of people around the world.)
Three, although I went through my undergrad and Ph.D. application processes years ago, the job application process is still fresh(ly smarting) in my memory. And my god have I learned things about the (Skype) interview process that I wished I'd known earlier. Even though I read the post about phone/Skype interviews on The Professor Is In blog (along with many others), there's nothing like being on the interviewing side that really brings these things home:
- Relax—if at all possible. While nervousness is often acknowledged by both parties, it puts a weight on all of your responses. And trust me, it's not good weight. (And contrary to what Sheryl Sandberg might say, don't lean in. It gives off a desperate vibe.)
- Smile—not an idiot smile, but a comfortable smile—and DON'T STOP. It's heartbreaking when an applicant that had been smiling stumbles on a difficult question and stops smiling. It's almost like a quiet declaration of defeat.
- Make declarative statements—we're not playing an improv game here; don't answer a question with a question. Even if you're wrong, just say it like you mean it—and believe that you're right. Confidence (even if it's feigned, but especially if it's genuine) can make you look like a million bucks.
- Be humble—yes, I know, I just emphasized confidence, but there's nothing more annoying than someone who isn't able to acknowledge just how much more there is to learn. Isn't that why we're in this business in the first place?
- Don't look at note(card)s—write stuff down on your brain. I think it's perfectly appropriate to have pen and paper ready to take notes (especially since it shows that you are taking seriously the conversation you are having), but there's something unnatural about looking at note(card)s while you are trying to have a conversation with your interviewers. Things you say in an interview should be second-nature—whether it's about yourself, your research, or the school to which you are applying. If it's not something you know, it shouldn't be coming out of your mouth.
I practiced doing a Skype interview twice, with my friend and my professor, and it was immensely helpful. But now I realize that what would've been even more helpful was to practice being an interviewer, so that I could see for myself the things to do and not to do. So if you have friends who are on the job market with you, give each other practice interviews! It'll be a great bonding experience, and it'll be hella useful too.
I'm learning an incredible amount through this admission process—and I’m sending positive energy to all the students who get to apply to university and take entrance exams! And even more positive energy to the folks who are on the job market (academic or not), trying to find a job that they are happy with.
[Yes, that's an alcohol ad...but I like it!!! It's so appropriate for my mood right now...]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







