While "the committee" and its formation are unique to each, I've come to terms with a few things about them over the years (and am a little bit wiser for them):
- Your advisor, chair, and mentor can all be different people. You're probably assigned a first-year mentor/advisor based on what you write in your application, but that person doesn't have to be your chair (or even co-chair) when you write your dissertation. Nor should you expect that person necessarily to be your mentor—the person who actually mentors you through your intellectual and professional development, with an eye to what's good for you as a young scholar. You don't have to expect all of these things from just one person.
- Your favorite prof doesn't have to be on your committee. Sometimes it's better not to have your most favorite awesomest mentor-est professor on your dissertation committee, especially given the drama and unpleasantness that can be involved in the Ph.D. process. That way you can still have that mentor to go and talk with about all the things going on in your grad school life, without having that person be involved in the messiness of revising, applying to jobs/fellowships, etc. It's very comforting to have that neutral space.
- Your favorite prof may not be other people's favorite prof. This is obvious, but a professor who is good to you—reads your drafts, gives you advice on jobs, helps you get funding—may not be the same way to your friends. So don't go off being a jerk about it, talking about how awesome this prof is with people who don't share your sentiments. Just like you can't be nice to everyone, profs can't be nice to all grad students equally, either. On the flip side, if you know a prof who is being a jerk to you, understand that maybe that prof is spending time and energy supporting and mentoring someone else. And that's OK too.
The wonderful thing about writing a dissertation is that so much of it is influenced by...everything. And that the work you produce is possible because of the committee you have—whether for better or for worse—is kind of cool. Having a different committee would influence you to write a different dissertation, of course—but no matter what, it's your dissertation, something that you can be proud of regardless of what committee members' names are on the first page.
With regards to your lede there's probably a joke in there about how 50% of marriages end in divorce. =P All jokes aside though, love the writing - hope you keep it up! =)
ReplyDeleteThanks, NathanM! Although I admit, I have no idea what it's like in the sciences/engineering...I wonder if it isn't a lot more difficult to switch advisors or join new labs, or seek out mentorship from profs you don't work with directly...I should talk to more of my techie friends.
DeleteI so agree with you on this and many other matters! Especially the "drama and unpleasantness" part! (((sigh)))
ReplyDeleteSigh indeed! I'm sure such "unpleasantness" is common in all fields and industries (not just academia), and I know that it's important to learn to work with professors...professionally. But man, sometimes it's so hard......
Deletegreat post, s. i was actually trying to disentangle this issue for myself as i realized my mentor, chair, adviser, and favorite are all different people. and that my life improved tenfold once i approached my committee as not a marriage but rather a coalition of folks with different interests who are still sharing some time/space with me. -ayk
ReplyDeleteThat's wonderful, A—actually it's kind of liberating to have that shift in thinking, and then to realize how lucky we are to have multiple people we can talk with for different concerns, intellectual or what have you. I trust that you have a great coalition, with you being the grounding force in it. :)
Delete